科爾尼上海銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理項(xiàng)目的建議書(shū)_第1頁(yè)
科爾尼上海銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理項(xiàng)目的建議書(shū)_第2頁(yè)
科爾尼上海銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理項(xiàng)目的建議書(shū)_第3頁(yè)
科爾尼上海銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理項(xiàng)目的建議書(shū)_第4頁(yè)
科爾尼上海銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理項(xiàng)目的建議書(shū)_第5頁(yè)
已閱讀5頁(yè),還剩72頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

科爾尼上海銀行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理項(xiàng)目的建議書(shū)Today’sDiscussionOurunderstandingofBoS’currentsituationOurperspectiveonproposedinitiativesandexpectedresultsforBoSTheeffortswouldfocusondeliveringtangibleresultsWehaveproposedahand-onhigh-caliberteamtojointlyworkwiththeBoSteamWehavestrongcommitmentstoBoSAppendixProjectConsultant’sCVsToday’sTeamYearofExperience7NameHongLiManager,Shanghai11PeterKooPositionPrincipal,Shanghai10DouglasE.JacksonManager,SingaporeRelevantExpertiseandExperienceHelpeddomesticandinternationalfinancialinstitutionsinstrategyandprocessdesignExtensiveexperiencesinbankingandinsuranceindustriesConsultingexperiencesfocusonprovidingcreditriskmanagementsolutionstodomesticandglobalbanksLedmanystrategicdesignandsystemdevelopmentprojectsforBanksinSingaporeandrestofAsiaVariousconsultingandindustryexperienceininternationalfinancialinstitutionsExpertiseincreditmanagement,underwritingandprocessing5VictorDuSeniorBusinessAnalyst,ShanghaiHelpeddomesticandinternationalcompaniesinoperationsimprovementandchangemanagementExperiencesinFinanceandM&A2MichaelYaoBusinessAnalyst,ShanghaiDevelopedareviewofChinasecuritiesmarketbyidentifyingkeyplayersandrespectivestrategies,studyingmarkettrendsandassessinggovernmentregulationsParticipatedtheproposalwritingofdesigningaonline-portalforaleadingstockexchangeinChina8JorgeAzevedoManager,BrazilExtensiveexperienceinriskandcapitalmanagementDevelopmentandimplementationofacomprehensivecreditriskmanagementapproachcoveringorganization,technology,processesandstatisticalmodelsinoneofthelargestBrazilianbanksDiagnosisofthecurrentsituationinoneofthelargestBrazilianbanksToday’sDiscussionOurunderstandingofBoS’currentsituationOurperspectiveonproposedinitiativesandexpectedresultsforBoSTheeffortswouldfocusondeliveringtangibleresultsWehaveproposedahand-onhigh-caliberteamtojointlyworkwiththeBoSteamWehavestrongcommitmentstoBoSAppendixProjectConsultant’sCVsI.OurUnderstandingofBoS’SituationOurrefinedproposalhasbeenbasedontherelevantinformationprovidedbyBoSwithinthepastweekRelevanceofInformationReceivedfromBoSStatedBoSCreditRiskManagementImperativesCategoryReports/DocumentsRelevancetoRiskGradingRelevancetoPortfolioManagementCustomerInfo.BasicInformation51CapitalStructure,Management,etc.52FinancialReports(P/L,B/S,C/F)52FinancialRatios52TransactionsSummaryExposurebyloansize24Exposurebyborrowersize24Exposurebyborrowerownership23Exposurebycollateraltype24Exposurebymaturity23Exposurebyindustry25Exposurebyloanperformance25Exposurebycustomerrating25Exposure/percentagebyfacilityrating25Exposureandfacilityratingbyindustry25OtherInformationOrganizationoftheBank23Creditapprovalprocesses44Summaryofphases1&2ofITdevelopment,andplanforphase343Source:BankofShanghai,ATKAnalysisDegreeofRelevanceLow1

5HighBasedontheinformationprovided,combinedwithourcreditexperience,wehaveconcludedthatBoS’currentstatemaybestilllaggingascomparedtoemergingrelevantpracticesinAsiaComparisonofBoSwithCommonAsianPracticesCustomerGradingFacilityGradingPortfolioManagementBoS’CurrentStateEmergingRelevantPracticesinAsiaCombinationofstatistics-basedandexpert-basedratingmethodologyConsiderthecustomertransactionrecordsLinktheriskratingwithEDFestimationStrictuplimitsettingforfacilitiesbasedondifferentratiosStatisticsandexpert-basedConductedduringtheapprovalprocess(pre-loan)BasisforpricingPurelyexpert-basedjudgmentalmethodologyStaticinformation-based,notconsideringcustomertransactionrecordsNostatisticsofEDFNostrictuplimitsettingforfacilitiesExpert-basedandjudgmentalConductedaftertheloanMainlyusedtomeettheregulatoryrequirementsPartlyusedinmonitoringandcontrolPortfoliomanagementfunctionsinplaceConductedpreliminarypositioningandtargetingPreliminaryconcentrationcontrolandlimitsNoportfoliomanagementfunctionsDifferentproductsarehandledseparately(e.g.retailandinternationalbusinesses)NoclearconcentrationcontrolandlimitAssuch,wehaveconcludedthatthestatedinitiativestosupportBoS’creditriskimperativesshouldbefocusednotonlyonmeetingtheshort-termneeds,butalsohighlightdirectionalbuildingblockstoserveasabasisforfuturecreditcapabilityexcellenceStatedBoSRequiredInitiativesandObjectivesBoSCreditRiskImperativesEffectivelyconductanalyticsbased oncurrentgradingsystemDevelopnecessaryportfolio managementreportsA.CreditRiskGradingAnalyticsB.PortfolioRiskManagementReportingLonger-termCapabilityGapAssessment/RecommendationsObjectivesAsafirststepindevelopingsomebasicpredictive(or“earlywarning”)capabilities,developtheriskgradinganalyticsthatlinkriskgradingwiththeEDF,thereforedevelopcreditapprovalandprocessingcapabilitiesleveragingtheexistinggradingsystemIdentifyreportingdevelopmentneeds,definethe“to-be”reportingframeworkanddistribution,anddesigntheformatandcontentofrequiredreports,thereforeimprovethedecision-makingandportfoliomanagementcapabilitiesBaselinethecurrentorganization,processandcapabilitiesaroundcreditriskgrading,figureoutthedirectionforfuturedevelopmentShort-termTangibleResultsLonger-termDirectionSettingTowardsExcellenceStatedBoS’immediateAreaofFocusInitiativesToday’sDiscussionOurunderstandingofBoS’currentsituationOurperspectiveonproposedinitiativesandexpectedresultsforBoSTheeffortswouldfocusondeliveringtangibleresultsWehaveproposedahand-onhigh-caliberteamtojointlyworkwiththeBoSteamWehavestrongcommitmentstoBoSAppendixProjectConsultant’sCVsProposedInitiativesandExpectedResultsII.OurPerspectivesofBoS’ProposedCreditEnhancementProgramToeffectivelysupportBoS’creditriskimperatives,weareproposing3keyinitiativesthatwouldsupportbothBoS’short-termandlong-termresultsBoSCreditRiskImperativesExpectedResultsFromProposedEffortsStatistically-basedriskgradingmodelforbothborrowerriskgrade,aswellasprocess/methodologyforfutureenhancementsAudience-focusedportfolioriskmanagementreportingdesignandhigh-levelsystemspecificationfocusedonreportingdeliveryprocessandinformationsourcingIdentificationofcapabilitygapsalongorganization,process,toolsandoperationsrelatedtocreditriskgradingandportfolioriskmanagementreportingQuantitativeModelFinancialAccountingVariablesExistingDefaultModelVariablesBorrower/FacilityVariablesQualitativeModelManagement/BusinessFactorsIndustryFactorsEDF+/-FacilityRisk(1)BorrowerRiskAdjustedByXLienPositionCovenantsGuaranteeFacilityMatchingCollateralCoverageGrade12345678910EDF(%)0.–.02.021–.04.041–.10.11–.50.51–2.02.01–15.015.01–30.030.01–65.065.01–90.090.01–100S&PAAAAAABBBBBBCCCCCCDGradeABCDEFGHIJLGD(%)(2)00.01 -2.02.01 -5.05.01 -9.09.01 -15.015.01 -25.025.01 -38.038.01 -55.055.01 -75.075.01 -100.FacilityRiskGradeBorrowerRiskGradeCreditRiskAssessmentToolsFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueReportsforPresident/VPReportsforHQCreditHeadsReportsforCredit-relatedDepartmentHeadReportsforBranchHeadsFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValue200420032002Q4Q3Q2Q1Q4Q3Q2Q1Q4Q3Q2Q1Ongoing)Effectivelyconductanalyticsbased oncurrentgradingsystemDevelopnecessaryportfolio managementreportsShort-termTangibleResultsLong-termDirectionSettingTowardsExcellenceInitiativesOurProposedFocusAreaA.CreditRiskGradingAnalyticsB.PortfolioRiskManagementReportingLonger-termCapabilityGapAssessment/RecommendationsCreditRiskGradingAnalyticsQuantitativeModelFinancialAccountingVariablesExistingDefaultModelVariablesBorrower/FacilityVariablesEDFFacilityRiskBorrowerRiskXLienPositionCollateralCoverageGrade12345678910EDF(%)0.–.02.021–.04.041–.10.11–.50.51–2.02.01–15.015.01–30.030.01–65.065.01–90.090.01–100.0S&PAAAAAABBBBBBCCCCCCDGradeABCDEFGHIJLossGivenDefault(%)00.01 -2.02.01 -5.05.01 -9.09.01 -15.015.01 -25.025.01 -38.038.01 -55.055.01 -75.075.01 -100.0FacilityRiskGradeBorrowerRiskGradeAsfortheriskgradinganalyticalmodel,wewouldexpect,withinthe6-7weekprojecttimeframe,tobaselinethecurrentgradingsystemandbuildlinksbetweencustomergradinganddecisionmakingindicatorslikeEDFIllustrativeForportfolioriskmanagementreporting,wewoulddeveloptheportfolioriskmanagementframework,distributionandusesofnecessaryreports,aswellastheirformatsandcontentsReportsFrameworkandDistribution

AssetAllocationCategoriesPortfolioPerformanceMetrics?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?Profitability

RiskAdjustedProfitability

Volume&Growth

Concentration

Provisions,Reserves&Capital

HistoricalLoanLosses&Volatility

NPLMetrics

CreditRiskMetrics

PortfolioSummaryMeasures?Industry?GroupMembership?OwnershipStructure?CollateralType?CustomerSize?BusinessUnit?CustomerLocation?CollateralLocation?Customer’sMarketLocation?CreditProduct?FacilitySize?Currency?Maturity?Floating/FixedRates?PortfolioRiskManagementFrameworkIllustrativeCurrentReportContentFormatIntendedReadersUses1.CustomerInformation1.1KeyAccountRankingName,Exposure,CustomerGradingExcelLendingstaff,CreditDept.TobetterunderstandtheKAs1.2CustomerTransactionRecordName,Guarantor,Collateral,Exposure,FacilityGrading,MaturityExcelLendingstaff,CreditDept.,AuditTomonitorthecustomertransactionrecord1.3CustomerFinancialReportsP/L,BalanceSheet,CashFlowStatement,OtherFinancialInfo.,KeyRatiosExcelLendingstaff,CreditDept.,AuditTounderstandthecustomers’financialperformance…………Excel…………2.LoanSummary2.1ByindustryIndustry,No.ofLoans,ExposureExcelLendingstaff,CreditDept.,researchTounderstandtheindustryconcentrationofloans2.2ByCustomerGradingCustomerGrading,Exposure,No.ofLoansExcelLendingstaff,CreditDept.,researchTounderstandtheconcentration…………Excel…………3.InternalPerformance3.1ExposurebyBranchBranch,No.ofLoans,ExposureExcelLendingstaff,CreditDept.,researchTounderstandtheperformancesandgeographicdifferences…………Excel…………CurrentReportFormatandContentFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueReportsforPresident/VPReportsforHQCreditHeadsReportsforCredit-relatedDepartmentHeadReportsforBranchHeadsFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueFacilityCustomerConcentrationLimitsValueReportsDistributionandUsesProposedOverallApproachATKhasproposedacustomizedapproachwithspecificinitiativesfocusedonimprovingBoScreditriskgradingandportfoliomanagementcapabilitieswithin6-7weeksA.CreditRisk GradingAnalyticsB.PortfolioRisk ManagementReportsFocusDiagnosesoundnessofcurrentriskgradingcapabilitiesAgreefuture-stateobjectivesandriskgradingprioritiesDeveloppreliminaryriskgradinganalyticalmodelleveragingBoS’existingcapabilityLaythegroundworkforachieveobjectiveDiagnosecomprehensivenessandusefulnessofcurrentportfoliomanagementinformationAgreefuture-stateobjectivesformanagingportfolioriskDesignhigh-priorityreports,identifycontentandlayoutdistributionframeworkInitiatedevelopmentofrequiredcapabilities

DiagnosticDesignPlanningDiagnosticDesignPlanning2-4Weeks3-4Weeks1-2Weeks3-5Weeks3-5Weeks1-2Weeks6-7Weeks

Implement

PlanA.CreditRiskGradingAnalytics–KeyActivitiesKeyActivitiesReviewgradingmodel,developmentmethodologyandintendedusesBaselinecurrentunderwritingandgradingpractices/policies/controlsBaselinecurrentunderwritingskills,culture,toolsandKPIsEvaluatecurrentfacilitygradingandpricingapproachesEvaluateinternal/externaldataenvironmentandimplicationsShowcaserelevantbestpracticesacrossabovedimensionsPreparegapanalysisAgreevisionandtimingforriskgradingcapabilitiesIdentifyanddefineinitiativestosupportriskgradingobjectives,suchas(2)Modelrecalibration/statisticalvalidationapproachesFacility/gradingpricingmechanismsDesignthemodelIdentifythekeyfactorsofcreditriskgradinganalyticsDesignthestatisticalmodeltoestimateEDFbasedoncurrentdataTestthemodelincreditmanagementDeterminetheinitiativestoachievelong-termanalyticsobjectivesDuringthefirst6-7weeks,weplantofocusoureffortwiththeassessmentofBoS’currentcreditriskgradingcapabilitiesandthedevelopmentofcreditriskgradinganalyticsDiagnose(1)AreaofFocusDesignNote: (1) Limitedtocreditgradingaspectsonly (2) Initiativestobedeterminedbasedonagreedvision1.2.3.B.PortfolioRiskManagement(PRM)Reporting–KeyActivitiesWewillalsofocusonportfolioriskmanagementreporting,relevantdocumentdesignanddevelopahigh-levelimplementationplan

ImplementKeyActivitiesDiagnoseDesignPlanBaselinecurrentreportingsystem,focusingondocumentationstructure,formatandcontentBaselinedistributionandusesofPRMinformation,especiallyinstrategicplanningandpolicydevelopmentPerformdetailedgapanalysisbetweencurrentBoSPRMreportingsystemanddocumentswithbestpracticesIdentifythekeyreportingdocumentsthatneedtobeimprovedordevelopedBaselinedataavailabilityandqualityAgreevisionandtimingfordevelopmentofportfoliomanagementcapabilitiesIdentifybusinessrequirementsonportfoliomanagementreportingDesignthereportingdocumentstructure/frameworkaccordingtoBoSbusinessrequirementsDevelopformatandcontentrequirementsofdocumentsbasedonbestpracticesDevelopguidelinesforreportgeneration1.2.3.Determinetheinitiativestodeveloplong-termreportingneedsAreaofFocusThroughoutthe6-7week’sproject,weintendtofocusonprovidingknowledgetransfertothecoreBoSteammemberswhilealsoprovidinginterimcheckpointalongthewayKeyWorkstreamsBeforeOfficialKick-off:BoSDataCleaningandPreparationCreditRiskGradingDiagnosethecurrentcreditriskratingsystemDesignrequiredriskgradinganalyticsmodelPrioritizeinitiativesanddevelopplanPortfolioManagementReportingDiagnosethecurrentportfoliomanagementsystem,focusingonthereportingdocumentsDesignrequiredreportingdocumentsDeveloprecommendations/plansforfurtherdevelopmentProposedWorkplanKeyMilestonesProjectKick-offPreliminaryWorkstreamsandMilestonesInterimReport01 2 3 45 6 7WeeksFinalReportToday’sDiscussionOurunderstandingofBoS’currentsituationOurperspectiveonproposedinitiativesandexpectedresultsforBoSTheeffortswouldfocusondeliveringtangibleresultsWehaveproposedahand-onhigh-caliberteamtojointlyworkwiththeBoSteamWehavestrongcommitmentstoBoSAppendixProjectConsultant’sCVsProposedApproach–KeyDeliverablesAreaofFocus

Implement

PlanCreditRiskGradingAnalyticsDiagnose(1)DesignNote: (1) LimitedtocreditriskgradingaspectsonlyA.1.1.RiskgradingorganizationbaselineA.1.2.RiskgradingprocessbaselineA.1.3RiskgradingtoolsassessmentA.1.4.RiskgradingcapabilitygapanalysisA.2.1.RiskgradingvisionandrequiredcapabilitiesA.2.2Short-termriskgradinganalyticsmodelA.3.3InitiativestobuildrequiredcapabilitiesA.3.1.Prioritizedinitiativesandhigh-levelinitiativeplan1.2.3.B.1.1.ReportingdocumentationbaselineB.1.2.DocumentedcurrentusesanddistributionofPRMinformationB.1.3.PRMreportinggapanalysisB.1.4.IdentifiedkeydocumentdevelopmentneedsB.2.1.Confirmedportfoliomanagementreportingdocumentsdistribution/framework(Shorttermandlongterm)B.2.2.Samplereportswithdesiredformatandcontent(Shortterm)B.3.1.PrioritizedinitiativesonfuturereportdevelopmentPortfolio-RiskManagement(PRM)ReportingIII.ProposedTangibleDeliverables

WorkingtogetherwithBoS,wewouldexpecttodelivertangibleandvalue-addedresults.Thedegreeofdepthwillstillbesubjecttofinalization/agreementwithBoSuponcompletionofthediagnosephaseA.B.III.ACreditRiskGradingAnalyticsEightkeydeliverableshavebeenidentifiedtospecificallyaddressBoS’shortandlongtermcreditriskgradinganalyticsrequirementsKeyDeliverablesModulesDeliverablesObjectivesA.1DiagnoseA.1.1. RiskgradingorganizationbaselineEnsureclearunderstandingofthecurrent/requiredorganizationalcapabilities(anizationaldependencies,KPIs,performancemeasures,etc)relatedtoensuringcreditriskgradingeffectivenessA.1.2. RiskgradingprocessbaselineEnsureclearunderstandingofthecurrent/requiredprocessingcapabilities(i.e.policysetting,appraisal,approvals,review,etc.)relatedtoensuringcreditriskgradingeffectivenessA.1.3 RiskgradingtoolsassessmentAssessmentandidentificationofshort/longer-termcreditriskgradingrelatedtool(s)capabilitygapswithrespecttorequiredcapabilitiesA.1.4. RiskgradingcapabilitygapanalysisSummaryofoverallcreditriskgradingrelatedcapabilitygapstoensurecreditprocessingrisksandissuesareidentifiedtominimizerisksrelatedtoimmediateprojectdeliveryrisksaswellaslonger-termcapabilitiesimperativesA.2DesignA.2.1. RiskgradingvisionandrequiredcapabilitiesClarityandconsensus,amongstkeystakeholders,ofoverallcreditriskgradingvisionandrequiredcapabilities–forbothshortandlonger-term–alignedtotheSMEbankingandcreditstrategyA.2.2. Short-termriskgradinganalyticalmodelDevelopmentofapracticalborrowerstatistically-basedgradingmodelleveragingBankofShanghai’sexistingcreditriskgradingtool–whilstidentifyingadditionalstatisticalfactorsrequiredforconsiderationEffectiveknowledgetransfertotheBoSteamtoensureself-sustainabilityinthenearfutureasthecreditriskgradingmodelfurtherevolves(asthemodelmaynotbeof100%confidencelevelbasedonpotentialexistinganalyticalandinformationqualitygaps)A.2.3 InitiativestobuildrequiredcapabilitiesIdentificationofadditionalmodelingcapabilitygapsaddressedbythemodelingteambasedonagreeduponassumptionsmadeduringtheprojectA.3PlanA.3.1 Prioritizedinitiativesandhigh-levelinitiativeplanSummaryofidentifiedkeyinitiatives,forbothoverallcreditriskgradingcapabilitiesaswellasanalyticalcapabilities,BankofShanghaishouldconsiderfurtheranalyzingorimplementingtoaddressmediumandlongertermcreditcapabilitiesissuesCreditRiskGradingAnalyticsIII.A.1.1RiskGradingOrganizationBaselineTheorganizationbaselinewillensureclearunderstandingofthecurrent/requiredorganizationalcapabilities(anizationaldependencies,KPIs,performancemeasures,etc)relatedtoensuringcreditriskgradingeffectivenessEvaluationandAssessmentCreditApprovalRiskAppraisal&PricingCalibrationofCRRPolicysettingforUsagePolicy/SystemSet-upCreditAppraisal/RenewalReviewKeyPerformanceIndicatorSkills&CultureAccuracyandtimelinessofevaluationreportingGoodloanprocessingrecordObjectiveness,fairnessandefficiencyincreditapprovalOverallobjectivenessandfairnessintheassessmentTimelinessinreportwritinganddeliveryNoperformanceevaluationcriteriaNoperformanceevaluationcriteriaWeakproblemidentificationcapabilityYearsofexperienceofcreditevaluationWeakatcreditandcustomerrecordscaparisonNospecificresponsiblepersonnelPreliminaryunderstandingofcustomer’screditstrengthwhichismainlybasedonfinancialindicatorsBasicregulationandpolicydefinitionRoles&ResponsibilitiesPeriodicallyevaluatetheperformanceoftheloantoensurerepayment

ApprovethequalifiedfacilityandloansRemarkandarticulatethepotentialbenefitsandrisksNospecificresponsiblepersonnelResponsibleforpreliminaryreportandregulationIllustrativeKeyAreatoProbeWhat’stheoverallorganizationalfitnesstoBoS’scurrentandfutureriskgradingsystem?Whatistherolesandresponsibilitiessetcurrentlyforeachposition?Whatisthecurrentperformanceevaluationcriteriaandindicatorsofeachpositionintheriskgrading?Whatareskillsandcapabilitiesrequirementofeachposition?WhatisthecreditriskmanagementcultureinBoS?CreditRiskGradingAnalyticsTheprocessbaselinewillensureclearunderstandingofthecurrent/requiredprocessingcapabilities(i.e.policysetting,appraisal,approvals,review,etc.)relatedtoensuringcreditriskgradingeffectivenessLevel2DetailsProvidedNote: (1) CRR=CreditRiskRatingSystem;ICTP=IntegratedCoreTransactionProcessingsystem (2) SubmitcreditapplicationdirectlytoBranchCreditManagementorthroughBranchCorporateBankingaccordinglytoauthoritylimits

RiskGradingProcessBaselineICTPCRRCRR3.1.1SetpolicyonuseofCRRModel3.1.2Review&approvepolicyNewapplicationRiskManagementCommitteeBranchCorporateBankingSub-BranchCorporateBankingBranchCreditManagementHQCreditManagementHQCorporateBankingEvaluationandAssessmentCreditApprovalRiskAppraisal&PricingCalibrationofCRRModelPolicysettingforModelUsageInput3.1.3CalibratetheCRRModelInput3.1.4Review&approveCRRModel3.1.6PreparecreditapplicationswithCRR(2)3.1.7Makecreditdecisions3.1.05DisseminatetheCRRModel3.1.6PreparecreditapplicationswithCRR3.1.8Informclientsandproceedwithloanprocessing3.1.8InformclientsandproceedwithloanprocessingCreditrenewalNewapplicationCreditrenewal3.1.9ReportandanalyzeInput3.1.10Review&approvechangeInputfromCRRdatabasePolicy/SystemSet-upCreditAppraisal/RenewalReviewIllustrativeKeyAreatoProbeWhatisthenormalloangrantingandriskgradingprocessofBoS?Whatprocedureandhowlongdoesittaketogothrougheachlinkageoftheriskgradingprocess?Whatarethedeterminant/coursechangingfactorsineachlinkageoftheprocess?Whomakedecisionineachlinkageoftheriskgradingprocessandwhat’stheirrespectiveauthorities?CreditRiskGradingAnalyticsIII.A.1.3RiskGradingToolsAssessmentThetoolsassessmentandidentificationofshort/longer-termcreditriskgradingwillidentifyrelatedtool(s)capabilitygapswithrespecttorequiredcapabilitiesCRRToolsCustomerInformationCollateralTransactionRecordsMacroeconomicConditionsCreditPoliciesGuarantorCustomerGradingFacilityGradingAnalyticalToolsEDFApprovalPricingProvisionLimit-SettingGood,butcanbeimprovedSomebasicutilizationNocurrentcapabilities√Riskgradingandpricingtools√Performancemeasurementtool(RAROC)√Individuallimitsystem√TransactionModel√StageofExcellenceClientModelMajorToolsNotapplicableforBoSstatusquoIllustrativeKeyAreatoProbeWhatarethetoolscurrentlyusedinBoSriskgradingsystem?Howwerethetoolsdeveloped?Whatarethesetools’currentusage?Aretheyfullyutilized?Whoarethemostfrequentlyusers?Whatarethecurrentusersspecificrequirement?Andwhatarethepotentialneedsandutilizationofthesetools?CreditRiskGradingAnalyticsIII.A.1.4RiskGradingCapacityGapAnalysisSummaryofoverallcreditriskgradingrelatedcapabilitygapswillensurecreditprocessingrisksandissuesareidentifiedtominimizerisksrelatedtoimmediateprojectdeliveryrisksaswellaslonger-termcapabilitiesimperatives…………The2gradingsystemsareseparatedandhavelittlerelationshipSystemintegrationNopre-loanfacilitygradingPost-loanfacilitygradingismainlyusedtomatchtheregulationrequirementsUsesoffacilitygradingGradinghaslimitedimpactoncreditapprovalUsesofcustomergradingIndicatorsselectedfollowingcompetitorsIndicatorSelectionGradingbasedonjudgmentalmethods,nostatisticallyreliablemethodsGradingmethodologyLackclarifiedriskappetiteClearriskappetite/cultureLackcustomerinformationandthecurrentdataisnotreliableenoughDatacompletenessandreliability54321RemarksonBoSBenchmarkingMajorGradingCapacities

Industrybestpractice BoSPracticeIllustrativeKeyAreatoProbeWhat’stheoverallgapbetweenBoS’scurrentandrequiredcapabilities?Generally,howdoesthegapimpacttheBoS’performance?WhichgapwillhavetheworstimpactonBoS’performance?Whereisthemostoutstandingshortageandwhichonemakesthebiggestnegativeimpactontheriskgrading?Whatcanbethepossiblemodelorevolving/developingdirectionforBoS’sriskgrading?CreditRiskGradingAnalyticsIII.A.2.1RiskGradingVisionandRequiredCapabilitiesWewillclarifyandachieveconsensus,amongstkeystakeholders,ofoverallcreditriskgradingvisionandrequiredcapabilities–forbothshortandlonger-term–alignedtotheSMEbankingandcreditstrategyStagesofExcellenceRiskGradingCharacteristicsStageIStageIVStageIIIStageIIStageIPortfolioManagementfunctionactsasinvestmentunitIncreasedportfoliomanagementindependenceinre-balancingtheportfolioPortfolioManagementadvisesonrisk-basedpricingPortfolioManagementfunctionresponsibleforreportingandmonitoringloanmovementandqualityCreditprocessinghandledbybranchesNoexistenceofPortfolioManagementfunctionOrganization/GovernanceDiversifiedportfoliobasedoncorrelation-adjustedportfoliowidemeasurementsActiveuseofsecondarymarketsIncreaseduseofsyndications,secondaryloanmarketpurchasesandsalesEarlyeffortstomeasurecorrelationsTargetingselectedcustomersonrisk-adjustedreturnbasisIntroductionofloansales,trading,andderivativesConstrainunderwritingt

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫(kù)網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論