熱點(diǎn)01人工智能AI（四大題型）

熱點(diǎn)解讀

2024年AI技術(shù)迎來多項(xiàng)熱門趨勢(shì)，包括生成式AI的廣泛應(yīng)用、多模態(tài)技術(shù)的突破以及AI與醫(yī)療健康

的深度融合等。這些趨勢(shì)不僅推動(dòng)了技術(shù)創(chuàng)新和行業(yè)變革，還帶來了對(duì)倫理與監(jiān)管的深入思考。未來，AI

技術(shù)將更加智能化、綜合化，應(yīng)用場(chǎng)景將進(jìn)一步拓展，同時(shí)，也需要關(guān)注其帶來的倫理和監(jiān)管問題，確保

AI技術(shù)的健康、可持續(xù)和負(fù)責(zé)任發(fā)展。

限時(shí)提升練（建議用時(shí)：60分鐘）

◎

熱點(diǎn)話題01

閱讀理解

Passage1

（24-25高三上?」匕京東城?期末）Theageofartificialintelligencehasbegun,anditbringsplentyof

anxieties.AlmostalloftheconversationsaboutriskhavetodowiththepotentialconsequencesofAIsystems

pursuinggoalsthatdepartfromwhattheywereprogrammedtodoandthatarenotintheinterestsofhumans.But

thisisonlyonesideofthedanger.ImaginewhatcouldunfoldifAIdoesdowhathumanswant.

“Whathumanswant,^^ofcourse,isn'tamonolith.Differentpeoplehavecountlessideasofwhatconstitutes

“thegreatergood.,,Evenifwecouldgeteveryonetofocusonthewell-beingoftheentirehumanspecies,ifs

unlikelywe'dbeabletoagreeonwhatthatmightlooklike.

ThatseemstobethereasonthatDeepMindrecentlyfoundedaninternalorganizationfocusedonAIsafety

andpreventingitsmanipulationbybadactors.Butit'snotidealthatwhafs"bad"isgoingtobedeterminedbya

handfulofindividualsatthisoneparticularcorporation-completewiththeirblindspotsandpersonalandcultural

biases（偏見）.Thepotentialproblemgoesbeyondhumansharmingotherhumans.Whafs"good"forhumanityhas,

manytimesthroughouthistory,comeattheexpenseofothersentient（有知覺力的）beings.Suchisthesituation

today.

IntheUSalone,wehavebillionsofanimalskeptinconfinement,subjectedtocrueltreatment,anddenialof

theirbasicpsychologicalandphysiologicalneedsatanygiventime.Entirespeciesaredominatedandsystemically

butcheredsothatwecanhaveomelets,burgersandshoes.

IfAIdoesexactlywhat"we"wantitto,thatwouldlikelymeanenactingthismasscrueltymoreefficiently,at

anevengreaterscaleandwithmoreautomationandfeweropportunitiesforsympathetichumanstostepinandflag

anythingparticularlyhorrifying.

AbettergoalthanaligningAIwithhumanity9simmediateinterestswouldbewhatIwouldcall“sentient

alignment”-AIactinginaccordancewiththeinterestsofallsentientbeings,includinghumans,allotheranimals

and,shoulditexist,sentientALThiswillstrikesomeasaggressive,becausewhafsgoodforallsentientlifemight

notalwaysagreewithwhafsgoodfbrhumankind.Itmightsometimes,evenoften,beinoppositiontowhat

humanswantorwhatwouldbebestforthegreatestnumberofus.

PeterSinger,aphilosopher,arguedthatanAIsystem'sultimategoalsandprioritiesaremoreimportantthan

itbeingalignedwithhumans.t4ThequestionisreallywhetherthissuperintelligentAIisgoingtobebenevolentand

wanttoproduceabetterworld,9,Singersaid,“andevenifwedon'tcontrolit,itstillwillproduceabetterworldin

whichourinterestswillgettakenintoaccount.

FmwithSingeronthis.Decenteringhumankindtoanyextent,andespeciallytothisextreme,isanideathat

willchallengepeople.Butthafsnecessaryifwe'retopreventourcurrentbelieffromspreadinginnewandawful

ways.

1.TheauthormentionstheorganizationfoundedbyDeepMindto.

A.questionasolutionB.clarifyabelief

C.illustrateanexampleD.explainapractice

2.Whichofthefollowingcanbestpresenttheideaof"sentientalignment”?

A.AIextendsthesamerightstolivingbeings.B.AIpromotestheinteractionamongspecies.

C.AIbenefitsfromthedevelopmentofhumans.D.AImeetsthedemandsofperceptivecreatures.

3.Whatdoestheunderlinedword“benevolent“inParagraph7probablymean?

A.Ambitious.B.Generous.C.Resourceful.D.Competitive.

4.Theauthor'smajorconcernindevelopingAIisthat.

A.AIposesathreattotheworldB.society'smoralsareindecline

C.humansprioritizetheirownneedsD.sentientbeingsdeepenculturalbiases

【答案】1.A2.D3.B4.C

【導(dǎo)語】本文是一篇議論文。文章主要討論了人工智能（AI）的發(fā)展以及人類應(yīng)如何設(shè)定AI的終極目標(biāo)和優(yōu)

先級(jí)，提出了“有知覺力的協(xié)調(diào)”這一概念，即AI應(yīng)符合所有有知覺力生物的利益，而不僅僅是人類的利益。

1.推理判斷題。根據(jù)第三段中“ThatseemstobethereasonthatDeepMindrecentlyfoundedaninternal

organizationfocusedonAIsafetyandpreventingitsmanipulationbybadactors.Butifsnotidealthatwhafs'bad'

isgoingtobedeterminedbyahandfulofindividualsatthisoneparticularcorporation-completewiththeirblind

spotsandpersonalandculturalbiases（偏見）.（這似乎就是DeepMind最近成立一個(gè)內(nèi)部組織的原因，該組織專

注于AI安全，并防止其被不良行為者操縱。但由這家特定公司的少數(shù)幾個(gè)人來決定什么是“壞”的并不理想

—他們也有自己的盲點(diǎn)以及個(gè)人和文化偏見）”可知，作者提到DeepMind成立的組織，是為了質(zhì)疑這種由

少數(shù)人決定AI“好壞”的解決方案。故選A項(xiàng)。

2.細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)第六段中“AbettergoalthanaligningAIwithhumanity5simmediateinterestswouldbewhat

Iwouldcall'sentientalignment5—AIactinginaccordancewiththeinterestsofallsentientbeings,including

humans,allotheranimalsand,shoulditexist,sentientAI.（一個(gè)比將AI與人類眼前利益相一致更好的目標(biāo)是我

所稱的“有知覺力的協(xié)調(diào)”——即AI的行為符合所有有知覺力生物的利益，包括人類、所有其他動(dòng)物，以及

如果存在的話，有知覺力的AI)”可知，“有知覺力的協(xié)調(diào)”指的是AI應(yīng)滿足所有有知覺力生物的需求。故選

D項(xiàng)。

3.詞句猜測(cè)題。根據(jù)劃線詞后文“andwanttoproduceabetterworld（并想要?jiǎng)?chuàng)造一個(gè)更好的世界）“可推知，"仁

慈的，善良的“人工智能才會(huì)想要?jiǎng)?chuàng)造一個(gè)更好的世界，戈U線詞benevolent與generous意思相近，意為“寬宏

大量的，仁慈的故選B項(xiàng)。

4.推理判斷題。通讀全文，尤其結(jié)合最后一段中“Decenteringhumankindtoanyextent,andespeciallytothis

extreme,isanideathatwillchallengepeople.Butthafsnecessaryifwe9retopreventourcurrentbelieffrom

spreadinginnewandawfulways.（在任何程度上，尤其是極端程度上，將人類置于中心之外，都是一個(gè)將挑

戰(zhàn)人們的想法。但如果我們想要阻止我們當(dāng)前的信念以新的、可怕的方式傳播，這是必要的）”可知，文章指

出人們關(guān)注人工智能按自身目標(biāo)行事的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，闡述了若人工智能按人類意愿可能帶來大規(guī)模殘忍情況，進(jìn)

而提出要考慮所有有知覺力生物利益的“有知覺力的協(xié)調(diào)”概念，都在強(qiáng)調(diào)不能只關(guān)注人類自身需求，要避

免人類只優(yōu)先考慮自己需求而忽視其他有知覺力生物的情況，即擔(dān)心的是人類在發(fā)展AI時(shí)過于優(yōu)先考慮自

己的需求，而忽視了其他有知覺力生物的利益。故選C項(xiàng)。

Passage2

（24-25高三上?北京?階段練習(xí)）September2022wasapparentlythemonthartificialintelligenceessay

anxietyboiledovernacademia,afterauserofanAIwritingserviceclaimedtobegettingstraightA*swithessays

written"usingartificialintelligence.Mostprofessorsexpressedconcern.Onewrote,“GradingsomethinganAl

wroteisanincrediblydepressingwasteofmy

Asallthisonlinedepressionwasplayingout,Iaskedmystudents,whoweremostlymajorsinwriting,to

submita2,000-wordproposalaboutalocalissue.IaskedthemtorelyontheAIasmuchaspossible.After

reviewingtheir22AIessays,Icantellyouconfidentlythatthetechnologyjustisn'tthere.Mystudentsusedfree

accessibletextgeneratorsonlineandputinalotofeffort.But,ifIhadbelievedtheseweregenuinestudentessays,

theverybestwouldhaveearnedsomewherearoundaCorC-minus.Manyoftheessayshadobviousredflagsfor

Algeneration:outdatedfacts,quotesfromprioruniversitypresidentspresentedascurrentpresidents,fictional

professorsandnamedstudentorganizationsthatdon'texist.Atthesametime,thestudentsreportedthatusingAl

requiredfarmoretimethansimplywritingtheiressaystheold-fashionedwaywouldhave.

TherehasbeenafairamountwrittenaboutthesupposedimpressivenessofAl-generatedtext.Thereareeven

severalhigh-profileAl-writtenarticles,essaysorevenscientificpapersorscreenplaysthatshowcasethis

impressiveness.Inmanyofthesecases,the“authors“haveaccesstohigher-qualitylanguagemodelsthanmost

studentsarecurrentlyabletouse.But,moreimportantly,thepublishedexamplesaregenerallythepolishedformof

professionalwritersandeditors.Incontrast,manyofmystudents9Al-generatedessaysshowedthecommon

problemsofstudentwriting-uncertaintyabouttheappropriatewritingstyle,issueswithorganizationand

transitions,andinconsistentparagraphing.Obviously,producingaqualityessaywithAIrequireshavinghigh

writingskillandrevisingskilltoproduceappropriateoutputs.

MyexperimentsotellsmethatagoodassignmentsheetisthebestdefenseagainstAIessays.Ifyour

assignmentis'"DescribethereasonsfortheU.S.CivilWar”,youaremorelikelytogetAIordownloadedessay

submissions.Myassignmentwasachallengebecauseitaskedstudentstoaddresslocalissuesofconcern.Thereare

justnotenoughrelevantexamplesinthedatatheAItextgeneratorsaredrawingfrom.

Ithasbeenjustoverfiveyearssincecomputerscientistsdeclared,taWeshouldstoptrainingradiologist（放射

科醫(yī)生）now.Deeplearningisgoingtodobetterthanradiologists.^^Well,we'restilltrainingradiologists,and

there'snoindicationthatdeeplearningisgoingtoreplacehumandoctorsanytimesoon.Inmuchthesameway,I

stronglysuspectfull-onrobotwritingwillalwaysandforeverbe'justaroundthecome”.

1.WhatdoestheauthorimplyinParagraph3?

A.Onlinetextgeneratorsarefarfromreliable.

B.Genuinestudentessaysdeservehighermarks.

C.Studentsneedtohavebettermasteryoftechnology.

D.RevisingapplicationsdecidethequalityofAIessays.

2.Intheauthor'sopinion,whatmaydiscouragetheuseofAItextgenerators?

A.StandardcriteriaB.Strictregulations.

C.Clearinstructions.D.Uniquewritingtasks.

3.Whatisthemainpurposeofthepassage?

A.ToassessAPsinfluenceonstudents*writing.

B.TodiscussthethreatofAltotheteachingofwriting.

C.ToappealfortheappropriateapplicationofAItextgenerators.

D.ToanalysethedifferencesbetweengenuineandAl-writtenessays.

【答案】1.A2.D3,B

【導(dǎo)語】本文是一篇議論文。文章主要討論了人工智能引發(fā)的學(xué)術(shù)焦慮，作者通過實(shí)驗(yàn)告訴我們，我們不

需要過于擔(dān)憂人工智能的使用。

1.推理判斷題。根據(jù)文章第三段“But,moreimportantly,thepublishedexamplesaregenerallythepolishedform

ofprofessionalwritersandeditors.Incontrast,manyofmystudents*Al-generatedessaysshowedthecommon

problemsofstudentwriting-uncertaintyabouttheappropriatewritingstyle,issueswithorganizationandtransitions,

andinconsistentparagraphing.Obviously,producingaqualityessaywithAIrequireshavinghighwritingskilland

revisingskilltoproduceappropriateoutputs.（但是，更重要的是，發(fā)表的例子通常是專業(yè)作家和編輯的潤(rùn)色形

式。相比之下，我的許多學(xué)生的人工智能論文顯示了學(xué)生寫作的常見問題——不確定合適的寫作風(fēng)格，組

織和過渡的問題，以及不一致的分段。顯然，用人工智能寫一篇高質(zhì)量的文章需要有很高的寫作技巧和修

改技巧來產(chǎn)生適當(dāng)?shù)妮敵觥＃?'可以推斷，用AI文本生成器想寫一篇高質(zhì)量的文章是不太可能的。因此，作

者認(rèn)為AI文本生成器并不可靠。故選A。

2.細(xì)節(jié)理解題。根據(jù)文章倒數(shù)第二段“Myexperimentsotellsmethatagoodassignmentsheetisthebestdefense

againstAIessays.Ifyourassignmentis"DescribethereasonsfortheU.S.CivilWar”,youaremorelikelytoget

AIordownloadedessaysubmissions.Myassignmentwasachallengebecauseitaskedstudentstoaddresslocal

issuesofconcern.TherearejustnotenoughrelevantexamplesinthedatatheAItextgeneratorsaredrawingfrom.

（我的實(shí)驗(yàn)告訴我，一份好的作業(yè)表是對(duì)抗人工智能論文的最佳方法。如果你的作業(yè)是“描述美國(guó)內(nèi)戰(zhàn)的原

因”，你更有可能得到人工智能或下載的論文提交。我的作業(yè)是一個(gè)挑戰(zhàn)，因?yàn)樗髮W(xué)生解決當(dāng)?shù)仃P(guān)注的

問題。AI文本生成器所使用的數(shù)據(jù)中沒有足夠的相關(guān)例子。廣可知，作者認(rèn)為如果不想讓學(xué)生使用AI文本

生成器，教師可以布置獨(dú)特的寫作任務(wù)，這樣學(xué)生就無法使用AI文本生成器。故選D。

3.推理判斷題。根據(jù)文章第——段"September2022wasapparentlythemonthartificialintelligenceessayanxiety

boiledovernacademia,afterauserofanAIwritingserviceclaimedtobegettingstraightA'swithessayswritten”

usingartificialintelligence.（2022年9月顯然是人工智能論文焦慮在學(xué)術(shù)界爆發(fā)的一個(gè)月,此前一名人工智能

寫作服務(wù)的用戶聲稱，用人工智能“寫”的論文得到了全A。大多數(shù)教授對(duì)此表示擔(dān)憂。廣以及最后一段力n

muchthesameway,Istronglysuspectfull-onrobotwritingwillalwaysandforeverbe"justaroundthecome”.（同

樣地，我強(qiáng)烈懷疑完全的機(jī)器人寫作將永遠(yuǎn)是“指日可待”。廠以及全文內(nèi)容可知，文章的目的是討論了人工

智能對(duì)于寫作教學(xué)的威脅，作者認(rèn)為人們無需太過于擔(dān)憂機(jī)器人寫作會(huì)代替學(xué)生寫作。故選B。

Passage3

（2024?北京東城?二模）YoumightnotthinkthatanAIcapableofmakingmusicwouldstimulateyour

emotion,butothersthinkdifferently,particularlythosewhogatheredatMexicoCity'sSymphonyHallin2019for

SchubertsUnfinishedSymphony,whichIfinishedusingmelodiesgeneratedbyanAI.

Astheorchestra（管弦樂團(tuán)）finishedSchuberfsoriginalworkandbeganthemusictheAIandIhadwritten,

Icouldfeelthecrowd'senergyshiftfromastonishmenttoindignationandfear.TheyseemedafraidthatanAI

mightbeabletomakeemotionalsymphonicmusic.Youcanseetheirpoint:anAIthatmakesemotionalmusic

couldaffecttheemotionallivesofthousandsorevenmillionsofpeopleinasmall,butprofoundway,justlikea

humanmusiciandoes.

Positiveandnegative,peoplereactedverystronglytoAl'ssymphonicdebut（首秀）.Eventhoughmost

peopledon'tbelievethatAIcancreatesomethingenjoyable,they,atleastpartly,didenjoytheUnfinished

Symphony.

Enjoymentinmusicimpliesthatthere9ssomethinginthemusicthatthelistenerconnectsto,aperceptionof

sharedemotion.But,inthecaseofAImusic,anemotionsharedwithwho?AI,asofyet,hasnoemotions.Sowhat

isthemeaningofmusicmadewithoutanemotionalcomposer?Theunsatisfyingansweristhatmusichasno

objectivemeaning.Acomposercandecidehowapieceofmusicsounds,butifsthelistenerthatdecideswhatit

means.

Nomatterhowit'screated,musicdoesn'texistinavacuum（真空）tothelistener.Themeaningweassignto

musicdependsonitscontext——howthepiececonnectstootherelementsinourlives.Withoutcontext,musicis

liketheresultsofagamewhoseruleshavebeenlost.Thecontextforamusicispartofwhoyouare.Themusicis

emotionaltoyoubecauseyouhavethecontexttoappreciateit.Asitcontinuestoevolve,AImusicwilldevelopits

owncontext.Certainly,if11bedifferentfromhuman-mademusic.Ifllmixexistinggenrestocreatenewones;it'll

combineinstrumentsthatwewouldn,tthinkofcombining.Itsruleswillbedifferent.

Fmnowalwaysaskedthesamequestion:4aWhoputtheemotioninthatmusic:you,thecomposer,orthe

AI?”Butthat'snotthequestiontheyreallywanttoask,though.There?sadeeperquestionthatmostpeoplearetoo

afraidtoaskrightnow:"Aremyemotionssosimplethattheycanbemaneuveredbyamachine?^^

Inmyexperience,thiscouldbepossibleoneday.IfamodestlycapablemusicAIin2019couldstirup

emotionsofanaudience,maybeAIcanhaveamorepowerfuleffectonouremotionallivesthanwe'dliketoadmit.

1.Theaudiencereactedstronglytothesymphonymainlydueto.

A.theirdoubtsaboutAFscapabilitiesB.theiruneasinessaboutAl'sinfluence

C.theorchestra'sbrilliantpresentationofAImusicD.thelikenessbetweenAImusicandtheoriginalwork

2.Whatmighttheauthoragreewith?

A.AIposeslittleimpactonpeople'semotions.

B.Musicbearsnointendedemotionalmeaning.

C.AImusicwilloutperformhuman-mademusic.

D.Thecontextreflectspeople'sinterpretationofmusic.

3.Whatdoestheword“maneuvered“underlinedinParagraph6mostprobablymean?

A.Refreshed.B.Challenged.C.Revealed.D.Directed.

4.Whichwouldbethebesttitleforthepassage?

A.AreComposersToBeReplaced?B.WouldAIMusicBeaRisingTrend?

C.CouldAIMakeMusicThatMovesYou?D.WastheUnfinishedSymphonySuccessful?

【答案】1.B2.B3.D4.C

【導(dǎo)語】這是一篇議論文。文章主要討論了人工智能是否能創(chuàng)作出富含情感的音樂的問題，論述了作者對(duì)

于音樂中情感的看法。

1.推理判斷題。根據(jù)第二段“Astheorchestra（管弦樂團(tuán)）finishedSchubert'soriginalworkandbeganthemusic

theAIandIhadwritten,Icouldfeelthecrowd'senergyshiftfromastonishmenttoindignationandfear.They

seemedafraidthatanAImightbeabletomakeemotionalsymphonicmusic.Youcanseetheirpoint:anAIthat

makesemotionalmusiccouldaffecttheemotionallivesofthousandsorevenmillionsofpeopleinasmall,but

profoundway,justlikeahumanmusiciandoes.（當(dāng)管弦樂隊(duì)演奏完舒伯特的原創(chuàng)作品，開始演奏人工智能和我

共同創(chuàng)作的音樂時(shí)，我能感覺到觀眾的情緒從驚訝轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閼嵟涂謶?。他們似乎?dān)心人工智能可能會(huì)創(chuàng)作

出充滿情感的交響樂。你可以看到他們的觀點(diǎn)：一個(gè)制作情感音樂的人工智能可以以一種微小但深刻的方

式影響數(shù)千甚至數(shù)百萬人的情感生活，就像一個(gè)人類音樂家一樣。）”可知，觀眾之所以對(duì)交響曲反應(yīng)強(qiáng)烈，

主要是因?yàn)閷?duì)人工智能的影響感到不安。故選B。

2.推理判斷題。根據(jù)第四段“AI,asofyet,hasnoemotions.Sowhatisthemeaningofmusicmadewithoutan

emotionalcomposer?Theunsatisfyingansweristhatmusichasnoobjectivemeaning.Acomposercandecidehow

apieceofmusicsounds,butifsthelistenerthatdecideswhatitmeans.（至lj目前為止，人工智能還沒有情感。那么，

沒有情感作曲家的音樂有什么意義呢?令人不滿意的答案是，音樂沒有客觀意義。作曲家可以決定一段音樂

的聲音，但聽眾可以決定它的意義。戶可知，作者可能會(huì)同意音樂沒有預(yù)期的情感含義。故選B。

3.詞句猜測(cè)題。根據(jù)第二段“Youcanseetheirpoint:anAIthatmakesemotionalmusiccouldaffecttheemotional

livesofthousandsorevenmillionsofpeopleinasmall,butprofoundway,justlikeahumanmusiciandoes.（你可

以看到他們的觀點(diǎn)：一個(gè)制作情感音樂的人工智能可以以一種微小但深刻的方式影響數(shù)千甚至數(shù)百萬人的

情感生活，就像一個(gè)人類音樂家一樣。）”以及劃線詞上文“Aremyemotionssosimplethattheycanbe”和后文

“byamachine”可知，人工智能制作的音樂可以影響數(shù)千甚至數(shù)百萬人的情感生活，所以大多數(shù)人不敢問的

問題是：我的情緒是否簡(jiǎn)單到可以被機(jī)器操縱？故劃線詞意思是“操縱”，與D選項(xiàng)Directed”指示，指導(dǎo)”

意思最接近。故選D。

4.主旨大意題。根據(jù)第三段“Positiveandnegative,peoplereactedverystronglytoAFssymphonicdebut（首秀）.

Eventhoughmostpeopledon'tbelievethatAIcancreatesomethingenjoyable,they,atleastpartly,didenjoythe

。叨而啊泌0吵（不管是正面還是負(fù)面，人們對(duì)AI的交響樂首演反應(yīng)非常強(qiáng)烈。盡管大多數(shù)人不相信人

工智能可以創(chuàng)造出令人愉快的東西，但他們（至少在一定程度上）確實(shí)喜歡《未完成的交響曲》戶結(jié)合文章

主要討論了人工智能是否能創(chuàng)作出富含情感的音樂的問題，論述了作者對(duì)于音樂中情感的看法?？芍?，C

選項(xiàng)“人工智能能做出打動(dòng)你的音樂嗎？”最符合文章標(biāo)題。故選C。

熱點(diǎn)話題02

閱讀七選五

Passage1

（2024?北京房山?一模）ThebeginningoftheYearoftheDragonhasforeshadoweda“SongofIceand

Fire“withtheemergenceofSora,atext-to-videoAImodel.VideosgeneratedbySoradisplaystrongconsistency

whenitcomestocharactersandbackgrounds,andsupportcontinuousshotsofupto60seconds,includinghighly

detailedsettingsandmultiplecameraangles.12

However,filminsidersnotedthatcurrently,Ai-generated60-secondvideoscannotsupportthecreationofa

full-lengthmovie,andtheideathatAItoolswill"bomb"thefilmandtelevisionindustryissofarunfounded.

Meanwhile,expertssaynottoworryexcessively,astheintegrationofAIwillhelpoptimizecertainoccupations,

attractmoreinnovativetalentsandbringnewpossibilitiestothefilmandtelevisionindustry.13

Fromtheageoffilmstocktothedigitalage,frompracticaleffectstodigitaleffects,from2Dto3D,Sora,

likeanytechnologicalrevolutioninthecentury-longhistoryoffilm,willimproveproductionefficiency,update

productionandmayevencreatenewgenresandtrendsinfilmmaking.14Studentslearningfilm

productioncanviewSoraasahelpfulassistanttounleashtheirsci-fiimagination.

FacingthepanicsignalsthatAItoolswillthreatentheglobalfilmindustry,filminsidersarguedthatthe

fundamentalDNAoffilmisartandthathumancreativitycannotbereplaced.15Manydirectors,

screenwriters,andactorsachievegreatworksbycontinuouslyintegratingpersonalemotionsandlifeexperiences.

ThiskindofindividualcreativitycannotbeimitatedbymachineslikeSora.

16However,justastheinventionofprintingdidnotreplaceliteratureortheinventionof

photographydidnotreplacepainting,Soraanditssubsequentupdatesandupgradeswillnotreplacefilmbecause

thecoreoftheseartformsiscreativity,whichisauniqueaspectofhumanthought.

A.WithOpenAFsiterationspeed,producingAIvideosdozensofminuteslongisnotfaroff.

B.Itisalsolikelytobeincorporatedintofilmandtelevisioneducationandtraininginthefuture.

C.Filmandtelevisionarecloselylinkedtotechnologicaladvancements,whichstimulatecreativity.

D.Sorawillundoubtedlypromptchangesinexistingindustrialproductionandmayevenreplacesomejobs.

E.Soraisundoubtedly“moreofanopportunitythanachallenge^^fortheglobalfilmandtelevisionindustry.

F.Creativityandfilmproductionrequirestheintegrationofemotionalexperiencesandindividualmemories.

G.Thisimpliesthatwithjustatextdescription,ordinarypeopleusingSoramaybeabletobecome“great

directors^^.

【答案】1.G2.E3.B4.F5.D

【導(dǎo)語】這是一篇說明文。短文介紹了工智能模型Sora對(duì)電影產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響，但專家表示Sora不會(huì)取代人類。

1.根據(jù)上文“VideosgeneratedbySoradisplaystrongconsistencywhenitcomestocharactersandbackgrounds,

andsupportcontinuousshotsofupto60seconds,includinghighlydetailedsettingsandmultiplecameraangles.”

（Sora生成的視頻在人物和背景方面顯示出強(qiáng)大的一致性，并支持長(zhǎng)達(dá)60秒的連續(xù)拍攝，包括高度詳細(xì)的

設(shè)置和多個(gè)相機(jī)角度。）可知，選項(xiàng)承接上文說明使用Sora的意義。故G選項(xiàng)“這意味著，只要一個(gè)文本描

述，使用Sora的普通人就可能成為“偉大的導(dǎo)演”。故選G項(xiàng)。

2.根據(jù)上文“Meanwhile,expertssaynottoworryexcessively,astheintegrationofAIwillhelpoptimizecertain

occupations,attractmoreinnovativetalentsandbringnewpossibilitiestothefilmandtelevisionindustry.^^（與止匕同

時(shí)，專家表示不必過度擔(dān)心，因?yàn)槿斯ぶ悄艿恼蠈⒂兄趦?yōu)化某些職業(yè)，吸引更多創(chuàng)新人才，并為影視

行業(yè)帶來新的可能性）可知，選項(xiàng)承接上文說明Sora給影視業(yè)帶來了機(jī)會(huì)大于挑戰(zhàn)。故E選項(xiàng)“對(duì)于全球影

視業(yè)來說，Sora無疑，與其說是挑戰(zhàn)，不如說是機(jī)遇，”切題。故選E項(xiàng)。

3.根據(jù)下文“StudentslearningfilmproductioncanviewSoraasahelpfulassistanttounleashtheirsci-fi

imagination”（學(xué)習(xí)電影制作的學(xué)生可以將Sora視為一個(gè)有用的助手，以釋放他們的科幻想象力。）可知，

Sora可能會(huì)被應(yīng)用于影視教育和培訓(xùn)，成為學(xué)生一個(gè)有用的助手。故B選項(xiàng)“它也有可能在未來被納入影

視教育和培訓(xùn)I”切題。故選B項(xiàng)。

4.根據(jù)上文“FacingthepanicsignalsthatAItoolswillthreatentheglobalfilmindustry,filminsidersarguedthat

thefundamentalDNAoffilmisartandthathumancreativitycannotbereplaced.”（面對(duì)人工智能工具將威脅全球

電影產(chǎn)業(yè)的恐慌信號(hào)，電影業(yè)內(nèi)人士辯稱，電影的基本DNA是藝術(shù)，人類的創(chuàng)造力是不可替代的）和下文

“Manydirectors,screenwriters,andactorsachievegreatworksbycontinuouslyintegratingpersonalemotionsand

lifeexperiences.ThiskindofindividualcreativitycannotbeimitatedbymachineslikeSora.”（許多導(dǎo)演、編居和

演員通過不斷融合個(gè)人情感和生活經(jīng)歷來創(chuàng)作偉大的作品。這種個(gè)人創(chuàng)造力是Sora這樣的機(jī)器無法模仿的）

可知，選項(xiàng)承接上文說明人類的創(chuàng)造力是不可替代的原因且要引出個(gè)人情感和生活經(jīng)歷對(duì)偉大作品創(chuàng)作的

重要性。故F選項(xiàng)“創(chuàng)意和電影制作需要情感體驗(yàn)和個(gè)人記憶的整合”切題。故選F項(xiàng)。

5.根據(jù)下文“However,justastheinventionofprintingdidnotreplaceliteratureortheinventionofphotography

didnotreplacepainting,Soraanditssubsequentupdatesandupgradeswillnotreplacefilmbecausethecoreof

theseartformsiscreativity,whichisauniqueaspectofhumanthought."（然而，正如印刷術(shù)的發(fā)明沒有取代文

學(xué)，攝影術(shù)的發(fā)明也沒有取代繪畫一樣，Sora及其后續(xù)的更新和升級(jí)也不會(huì)取代電影，因?yàn)檫@些藝術(shù)形式

的核心是創(chuàng)造力，這是人類思想的一個(gè)獨(dú)特方面。）可知Sora不會(huì)取代電影、讓人失去崗位，下文與選項(xiàng)為

轉(zhuǎn)折關(guān)系說明毫無疑問，Sora肯能促使變化，取代某些崗位。故D選項(xiàng)“Sora將促使現(xiàn)有工業(yè)生產(chǎn)發(fā)生變化,

甚至可能取代一些工作崗位”切題。故選D項(xiàng)。

Passage2

（2024?湖北?一模）WhenIwasinprimaryschool,readingindexcards（索弓I卡）undertheguidanceofour

librarianwashowmyclassmatesandIlocatedthebookswewantedandenteredtheworldofideas.Itwasamazing.

1Thenthesamelibrarianexplainedthatbook-locatinginformationwasalsoavailableonawebsite.Wecould

selectbookswithoutevenleavingourchairs.

2Thelibrarianwasnotconfidentthatthenewtechnologywouldlast.So,askids,wekeptonefoot

plantedineachworld,learningthedigitallandscapewhilealsophysicallyexploringlibraries.

Throughouteducationalhistory,newtoolshavebeenaccepted,rejected,orignored.Digitalcardcatalogues

（目錄）areanexampleoftoolsthatfacilitatelearning,leadingmanyschoolstoadoptagenerallyfriendlyattitude

towardnewtechnologies.3Sometoolsnegativelyaffectourlearning,themostrecentexamplebeing

ChatGPT.

ChatGPTisanartificialintelligence（AI）chatbotthatcanrespondtothequestionsoneasks,drawingon

storesofinformationanditsinteractionswithotherusers.WhereChatGPTimpactseducationisincompletingtasks

assignedtostudents.Studentscanquitthinking-allowingChatGPTtodigestdifficultreadingsontheirbehalf.

4

Butlearningtowriteislearningtothink.Thinkingissomethingweneedtogrowandprogressashuman

beings.5ChatGPTandrelatedtechnologiesdestroythisimportanttask.Irecommendthatstudentsresist

employingtheminthecontextofreadingandwritingiftheywishtobetransformedbytheirlearning.

A.Sure,AIcandothesetasksforus.

B.Educationismeanttoshapeaperson.

C.Butnotalltoolsareequallyconstructive.

D.Theycanalsoaskittoconstructessaysassignedbyprofessors.

E.IfallowedtohaveaccesstoAl-basedtools,noonewouldeverthink.

F.However,thiswholeprocessseemeddisappointingtheverynextday.

G.Inthosedays,wewerelivingbetweenthedigitalandpre-digitalworlds.

【答案】1.F2.G3.C4.D5.E

【導(dǎo)語】本文是一篇說明文。文章主要介紹了教育技術(shù)的發(fā)展，特別是人工智能聊天機(jī)器人ChatGPT在教

育中的應(yīng)用，以及它對(duì)學(xué)生的學(xué)習(xí)和思考能力可能產(chǎn)生的負(fù)面影響，呼吁學(xué)生在閱讀和寫作中保持獨(dú)立思

考。

1.前文“WhenIwasinprimaryschool,readingindexcards（索弓I卡）undertheguidanceofourlibrarianwashow

myclassmatesandIlocatedthebookswewantedandenteredtheworldofideas.Itwasamazing.（在我上小學(xué)的

時(shí)候，在圖書管理員的指導(dǎo)下閱讀索引卡是我和同學(xué)們找到我們想要的書，進(jìn)入思想世界的方式。太神奇

了）”提到用傳統(tǒng)的索引卡檢索圖書的方法，學(xué)生對(duì)這一方法感到驚奇，后文“Thenthesamelibrarianexplained

thatbook-locatinginformationwasalsoavailableonawebsite.（然后,同一個(gè)圖書管理員解釋說，在一個(gè)網(wǎng)站上

也可以找到圖書定位信息）”提到在線檢索的便捷，空處應(yīng)實(shí)現(xiàn)過渡，可能與傳統(tǒng)方法的不足有關(guān)，因此F項(xiàng)

“However,thiswholeprocessseemeddisappointingtheverynextday.（然而，第二天，整個(gè)過程似乎令人失望）”

符合語境，指出索引卡檢索讓人失望，和前文構(gòu)成轉(zhuǎn)折，引出后文。故選F。

2.后文“Thelibrarianwasnotconfidentthatthenewtechnologywouldlast.So,askids,wekeptonefootplantedin

eachworld,learningthedigitallandscapewhilealsophysicallyexploringlibraries.（圖書管理員對(duì)這項(xiàng)新技術(shù)能

否持續(xù)下去沒有信心。所以，當(dāng)我們還是孩子的時(shí)候，我們?cè)诿總€(gè)世界都有自己的足跡，一邊學(xué)習(xí)數(shù)字世

界，一邊探索圖書館）”具體講述了“我們”在圖書館中同時(shí)使用兩種方法，空處作為段首句，應(yīng)該會(huì)總的概括

這種情況，因此G項(xiàng)“Inthosedays,wewerelivingbetweenthedigitalandpre-digitalworlds.（在那些日子里，

我們生活在數(shù)字和前數(shù)字世界之間）”符合語境，用“生活在數(shù)字和前數(shù)字世界之間”概括了當(dāng)時(shí)的情況，契合

后文內(nèi)容。故選G。

3.前文“Digitalcardcatalogues（目錄）areanexampleoftoolsthatfacilitatelearning,leadingmanyschoolsto

adoptagenerallyfriendlyattitudetowardnewtechnologies.（數(shù)字卡片目錄是促進(jìn)學(xué)習(xí)的工具的一個(gè)例子，導(dǎo)致

許多學(xué)校對(duì)新技術(shù)采取普遍友好的態(tài)度）”以數(shù)字卡片目錄為例，講述了新工具的優(yōu)勢(shì)，后文“Sometools

negativelyaffectourlearning,themostrecentexamplebeingChatGPT.（有些工具會(huì)對(duì)我們的學(xué)習(xí)產(chǎn)生負(fù)面影

響，最近的例子是ChatGPT）”